On this page
How do you assign annual PMR or PMC study status?
Retrieve the actual obligation, original schedule, prior revisions and study evidence at the reporting cutoff. Apply the relevant regulatory status definitions and explain progress or delay. Preserve enrollment, completion and final-report submission records, and continue the applicable annual reporting until FDA provides the specified written closure. Submitted and fulfilled are different dispositions.
Before you begin
Applicable NDA/ANDA reports under 314.81(b)(2)(vii–viii) and BLA reports under 601.70, with other studies assessed under the relevant framework.
What you will prepare: A reconciled obligation register and study-specific annual status narratives.
Sections covered in this guide (2)
Start from the exact commitment or requirement
Collect approval and postapproval letters, commitment identifiers, exact wording, original milestone dates and all later FDA correspondence. Distinguish a legally required study from a study the applicant committed to conduct; do not decide the category from a project's internal label.
Build a register with application/product, obligation identifier, legal or commitment basis, objective/population, protocol identifier, original schedule, previously submitted revisions, current proposed schedule, status at the reporting cutoff, evidence reference and owner. Retain original milestones even when the internal project plan has moved.
1.13.12: make the regulated study status reproducible
For the applicable clinical safety, efficacy, clinical pharmacology and nonclinical toxicology studies, provide the required application identity, commitment date, study description, schedule, current status and explanation. Use the regulatory status terms, pending, ongoing, delayed, terminated or submitted, with their actual definitions.
A study behind the original schedule cannot be relabeled ongoing merely because it follows a recently revised internal schedule. Explain enrollment to date and planned enrollment where relevant, the milestone change, reason and corrective plan. Reconcile completion and report-submission dates with the actual records.
Continue reporting the applicable status until FDA's written notification establishes the recognized fulfilled or other closure disposition. A final report receipt or internal “done” flag is not the same as FDA concurrence. For pediatric requirements, coordinate current due-diligence and any deferral-extension issues with the responsible owner; annual reporting does not itself extend a deadline.
1.13.13: keep other studies and CMC work visible
314.81(b)(2)(viii) separately addresses other postmarketing studies, including agreed CMC studies and product stability studies. Identify what was promised, the batches/process/products involved, work completed during the interval, findings and the next milestone. Do not remove this work from the report because it is absent from a public clinical PMR list.
A practical stability-status entry identifies the commitment, batches/presentations, available time points, significant findings, expected remaining work and where the underlying data reside. For a BLA, establish the relevant reporting basis rather than automatically importing the NDA/ANDA other-study provision. A safety or quality finding may also trigger a separate action outside the annual cycle.
Worked review: submitted is not fulfilled
Fictional editorial exercise: a final study report was submitted, but FDA has not issued a fulfillment letter. The annual report removes the study from the register. Restore the applicable status and preserve the submission reference until the proper closure is documented.
Change the scenario to an ongoing stability commitment that is not a clinical PMR. It still needs the appropriate other-study assessment. If the original letter or schedule is missing, recover it before assigning a status; a project team's current target cannot reconstruct the agency baseline.
Assign the status from milestones and submission evidence
Use these definitions for studies within §314.81(b)(2)(vii) or §601.70. Assess other CMC and stability work under its own applicable reporting basis instead of assuming every study uses the same public status framework.
| Status | Relevant boundary | Evidence to inspect |
|---|---|---|
| Pending | Not initiated and not delayed | Actual start status compared with the original schedule |
| Ongoing | Proceeding on or ahead of the original schedule | Accrual and other committed milestone records |
| Delayed | Behind the original schedule | Missed original milestone, explanation and revised plan |
| Terminated | Ended before completion; final report not submitted | Termination record and report-submission status |
| Submitted | Completed or terminated, with final report submitted | Completion/termination date and actual final-report submission |
Preserve both the original schedule and the most recent previously submitted revision when the schedule has changed. An internal project plan is useful management information, but it must not replace the regulatory baseline. Include the reason for a new revision and the applicable enrollment information so the status is understandable rather than a color in a tracker.
Schedule exercise: the original final-report milestone has passed. An internal steering group approves a later target and the study now meets that target. The later plan does not make the study on time against the original schedule. Report the actual status, explain the cause and provide the revised schedule. If there is FDA correspondence affecting the obligation, preserve and assess that exact record instead of inferring its meaning from the team’s new date.
Termination exercise: a study ended early and its final report was subsequently submitted. The applicable definition of submitted includes terminated studies with a submitted final report. Preserve the reason for termination and actual submission date; do not infer successful completion or FDA fulfillment from that status.
For a BLA report under §601.70, the regulation also specifies a completed Form FDA 2252 with the annual progress report. The fact that BLA content differs from an NDA annual report does not remove that shared transmittal requirement. Use the current form and submission instructions when preparing the actual package.
For closure, retrieve the FDA notification that addresses the study commitment. A transmission receipt confirms delivery, and a final study report documents the study; neither alone establishes FDA concurrence with fulfillment or the other recognized closure grounds. Continue the applicable reporting while that disposition remains pending.
Keep the NDA/ANDA annual report synchronized with the obligation register. Other-study reporting under §314.81(b)(2)(viii) includes agreed CMC studies and all product stability studies; absence from a public clinical-study list does not establish that no reporting is needed.
Your preparation checklist
0/4 checkedUse this to track your review in this visit. Checks are not saved and do not establish regulatory compliance.
Frequently asked questions
Can a study be ongoing if it is on track against a revised internal schedule?
The cited regulations define ongoing against the original schedule. If the study is behind that schedule, an internal revision does not erase the delay. Preserve the original and previously submitted revised milestones, explain the actual progress and assess any relevant FDA correspondence rather than substituting the latest project plan.
Can a study be removed from the annual report when its final report is submitted?
Submission alone does not establish closure. For the covered studies, the regulations continue annual reporting until FDA’s written notification concurs with fulfillment or the recognized conclusion that the study is no longer feasible or useful. Keep the submitted status and evidence until the actual agency disposition supports removal.
What status applies after a terminated study’s final report is submitted?
Under the cited definitions, submitted includes a study that was completed or terminated and whose final report has been submitted to FDA. Retain the termination explanation and report reference. That status describes the reporting stage; it does not assert that the study succeeded or FDA considers the obligation fulfilled.
Can stability studies be omitted because they are not clinical PMRs?
Not on that basis. Section 314.81(b)(2)(viii) separately requires status reporting for other postmarketing studies, including agreed CMC studies and all product stability studies. Identify the actual application and reporting basis. For a BLA, assess its own provisions rather than importing this NDA/ANDA rule without analysis.
Sources and revisions
Requirements, source recommendations and editorial preparation advice have different roles. Review the scope and revision of the source you use.
Regulation
21 CFR 314.81: other postmarketing reports ↗Paragraphs (a), (b)(1) and (b)(2); eCFR current through September 18, 2026.
Regulation
21 CFR 601.70: annual progress reports of postmarketing studies ↗Scope, study status, schedule and written FDA closure; eCFR current through September 18, 2026.
Regulation
21 CFR 601.12: changes to an approved application ↗Paragraphs (d) and (f)(3), annual-report changes and labeling; eCFR current through September 18, 2026.
Statute
Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2026 ↗Public Law 119-75, enacted February 3, 2026; sections 6601(c) and 6602 distinguish future application applicability from the enforcement transition.
Technical specification · placement only
FDA eCTD v4.0 comprehensive hierarchy ↗Version 2.2, February 2025. Section 1.13.12. A heading identifies placement, not mandatory applicability.

